🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 879+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(879 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$16​
$26.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPattern : PlainArticle number : ON381R00Z-O11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear

Rise : High
Pattern : Plain
Article number : ON381R00Z-O11​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1604015

Category: Women > Clothing > Underwear

Original Price:$26.67 USD

Sale Price:$16 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6711 reviews
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear!
Not remarkable, simply okay.
2 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
The ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear is plain to use.
37 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid quality
In daily use, the ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear does its job which is good enough.
13 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
After assorted use, it feels solid enough and I’m satisfied.
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific product
So far, the ONLVICKY S-LESS MINI 2-PACK NOOS - Shapewear feels solid so it’s acceptable.
23 people found this helpful